On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:32:23 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > The PM8921 is an SSBI PMIC but in the binding example it is described > as being part of an SPMI PMIC while using an SSBI address. > > Make the example consistent by using the sibling PM8941 SPMI PMIC > instead. > > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: fix inconsistent example commit: 33f4ac16540509af518580abe730d409e8098aca Best regards, -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com