Hello again,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 05:45:46PM +0800, William Qiu wrote:
> +static const struct ocores_pwm_data jh7100_pwm_data = {
> + .get_ch_base = starfive_jh71x0_get_ch_base,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ocores_pwm_data jh7110_pwm_data = {
> + .get_ch_base = starfive_jh71x0_get_ch_base,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ocores_pwm_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "opencores,pwm-v1" },
> + { .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-pwm", .data = &jh7100_pwm_data},
> + { .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-pwm", .data = &jh7110_pwm_data},
> + { /* sentinel */ }
Looking at the binding
compatible = "opencores,pwm-v1";
isn't a valid configuration. If that is indeed the case and you always
have either starfive,jh7100-pwm or starfive,jh7110-pwm, you can drop the
logic to only use starfive_jh71x0_get_ch_base conditionally.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
