On 22/12/2023 15:49, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 08:50:14AM +0100, André Apitzsch wrote: >> Am Sonntag, dem 17.12.2023 um 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring: >>> On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:21:39 +0100, André Apitzsch wrote: > >>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: >>> /builds/robherring/dt-review- >>> ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65132.yaml >>> : 'maintainers' is a required property >>> hint: Metaschema for devicetree binding documentation >>> from schema $id: >>> http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/base.yaml# > >> I haven't add a maintainer, yet, as the driver for tps65132 doesn't >> list one. > >> Who is willing to be listed as maintainer for this device or who can be >> asked to become a maintainer for tps65132? > > You could just put the list in as a fallback I guess? > > The requirement for DT maintainer does seem to in conflict with the push > to convert things when people are doing incidental work on the driver... I agree. How about relaxing the check and not marking missing maintainer as a failure? Best regards, Krzysztof