On 12/21/23 09:00, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> The cmu_misc clock-names were renamed to just "bus" and "sss" because
> naming is local to the module, so cmu_misc is implied. As the bindings
> and the device tree have not made a release yet, comply with the
> renamed clocks.
>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
> index 9747cb3fa03a..d838e3a7af6e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10010000 {
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> clocks = <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_BUS>,
> <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_MISC_SSS>;
> - clock-names = "dout_cmu_misc_bus", "dout_cmu_misc_sss";
> + clock-names = "bus", "sss";
> };
>
> watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 {
argh, please ignore the patch set. It seems that the clock driver has to
be updated as well:
[ 0.050947] exynos_arm64_register_cmu: could not enable bus clock
dout_cmu_misc_bus; err = -2
[ 0.052385] exynos_arm64_register_cmu: could not enable bus clock
dout_cmu_peric0_bus; err = -2
