On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 05:16:08PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 12:05:17PM -0500, Abdel Alkuor wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:25:15PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 11:27:29AM -0500, Abdel Alkuor wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 03:18:24PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Abdel Alkuor wrote: > > > > > > > > > No, not all of them support the interrupt. Just tmp101, tmp102, tmp112, and as6200. > > > > For now, I'll add the check for ams,as6200. > > > > > Hi Conor, > > > If multiple devices have the interrupt you should document it for all of > > > them IMO. > > > > The interrupt hasn't been implemented for tmp101, tmp102 and tmp112 yet. > > Should I still add them to the interrupt property? They might be two different > > things driver and bindings, but I just wanted to make sure. > > I don't really care if the driver supports the interrupt on any of the > platforms (including the as6200), if the hardware has an interrupt the > binding should reflect that :) Understood. I'll add them in v4. Abdel
