Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:30:17PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The current PON example is a bit of a mess after converting the binding
> document to yaml and in the process updating parts of the example to
> match the pmk8350 binding while leaving parts from the older pm8998
> example in place.
>
> Clean up the example and make it consistent by adding some newline
> separators; dropping labels; removing stray spaces; fixing the PON node
> name; and fixing the unit address so that it matches the interrupt
> specifiers (which re-encodes the PON base address, 0x800 => 0x8).
>
> Fixes: 76ba1900cb67 ("dt-bindings: power: reset: qcom-pon: Convert qcom PON binding to yaml")
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
I noticed that this on is not yet in linux-next so sending a reminder.
Johan
