Hi Thomas,
>On Wed, Nov 29 2023 at 13:43, James Tai wrote:
>> +static int realtek_intc_rtd1619b_suspend(struct device *dev) {
>> + struct realtek_intc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + const struct realtek_intc_info *info = data->info;
>> +
>> + data->saved_en = readl(data->base + info->scpu_int_en_offset);
>> +
>> + writel(DISABLE_INTC, data->base + info->scpu_int_en_offset);
>> + writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->umsk_isr_offset);
>> + writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->isr_offset);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realtek_intc_rtd1619b_resume(struct device *dev) {
>> + struct realtek_intc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + const struct realtek_intc_info *info = data->info;
>> +
>> + writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->umsk_isr_offset);
>> + writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->isr_offset);
>> + writel(data->saved_en, data->base + info->scpu_int_en_offset);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops realtek_intc_rtd1619b_pm_ops = {
>> + .suspend_noirq = realtek_intc_rtd1619b_suspend,
>> + .resume_noirq = realtek_intc_rtd1619b_resume, };
>
>So this is the 4th copy of the same code, really? Why is this not part of the
>common code?
>
Yes it is the same code.
I had originally assumed that each platform would require some different settings,
but I've realized that there is no such requirement in the current architecture.
I will move this part to the common code.
Thanks for your feedback.
Regards,
James
