On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 10:35 AM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 09:34:39AM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote: > > Hello Conor, > > > > On 12/12/23 11:14, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote: > > > > From: Johannes Holland <johannes.holland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Add a dt schema to support device tree bindings > > > "Add bindings for..." > > Fixed. > > > > > > > for the generic I2C > > > > physical layer. Refer to the TCG PC Client Platform TPM Profile (PTP) > > > > Specification for TPM 2.0 v1.04 Revision 14. > > > > > > > > This includes descriptions for the Nuvoton and Infineon devices. > > > > > > > > OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 3 > > > I have no idea what this is, but it needs to be removed from the patch. > > Removed. > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Holland <johannes.holland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 000000000000..de1e34065748 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > > +--- > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml# > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > + > > > > +title: I2C PTP based TPM Devices > > > > + > > > > +maintainers: > > > > + - Johannes Holland <johannes.holland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > + > > > > +description: > > > > + Device Tree Bindings for I2C based Trusted Platform Module (TPM). > > > s/Device Tree Bindings for //. Doesn't dt_binding_check now complain if > > > you have this in a title or description? > > Fixed. > > > > > > > +properties: > > > > + $nodename: > > > > + pattern: "^tpm(@[0-9a-f]+)?$" > > > > + > > > > + compatible: > > > > + oneOf: > > > > + - description: Infineon's Trusted Platform Module (TPM) (SLB9673). > > > > + items: > > > > + - const: infineon,slb9673 > > > > + - const: tcg,tpm-tis-i2c > > > > + - description: Nuvoton's Trusted Platform Module (TPM) (NPCT75x). > > > > + items: > > > > + - const: nuvoton,npct75x > > > > + - const: tcg,tpm-tis-i2c > > Also, another thought - the bus is not usually encoded in the compatible > string, so it would be good to remove that. True, but we already have 3 different bus variants in this case. So that ship has sailed. Rob