On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 07:39:59PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 12/12/23 10:30, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote: > > [...] > > > SM6375, I think GIC_SPI is fine but I will try to get back on this. > interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 302 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > <&mpm 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > <&mpm 93 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>, > <&mpm 94 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>; > interrupt-names = "hs_phy_irq", > "ss_phy_irq", > "dm_hs_phy_irq", > "dp_hs_phy_irq"; > > the mpm node is not yet upstream (I only managed to untangle the > related mess recently), I'll submit this soon. Perfect, thanks! Johan
