On 09/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
> JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops starfive_wdt_pm_ops = {
> static const struct of_device_id starfive_wdt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant },
> { .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> + { .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
Device is compatible, so why not expressing it in the bindings and
dropping this change?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
