On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 15:37 -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> Checkpatch presumes attributes marked with __aligned(alignment) are part
> of a function declaration and throws a warning stating that those
> compiler attributes should have an identifier name which is not correct.
> Add __aligned compiler attributes to the list of attribute notes
> so they don't cause warnings anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> The patch that would trigger the mentioned checkpatch warning in this series is
> patch number 12 (iio: adc: Add support for AD7091R-8).
>
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 25fdb7fda112..e6773ae0ad08 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ our $Attribute = qr{
> __ro_after_init|
> __kprobes|
> $InitAttribute|
> + __aligned|
__aligned takes an argument so I think there needs
to have something like the use of __alloc_size below
this addition
__alloc_size\s*\(\s*\d+\s*(?:,\s*\d+\s*)?\)
maybe
__aligned\s*\([^\)]*\)
though even that would work well with most uses it
would not work with things like
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c: u8 cache[HASH_CACHE_SIZE] __aligned(sizeof(u32));
