Hi Jim, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on brgl/gpio/for-next] [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next linus/master v6.7-rc4 next-20231206] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jim-Liu/dt-bindings-gpio-add-NPCM-sgpio-driver-bindings/20231206-095724 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206014530.1600151-4-jim.t90615%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v8 3/3] gpio: nuvoton: Add Nuvoton NPCM sgpio driver config: nios2-randconfig-r131-20231207 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231207/202312070733.GNrG7abU-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231207/202312070733.GNrG7abU-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312070733.GNrG7abU-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:150:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected struct device const *dev @@ got int @@ drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:150:17: sparse: expected struct device const *dev drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:150:17: sparse: got int >> drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:150:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected struct device const *dev @@ got int @@ drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:150:17: sparse: expected struct device const *dev drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:150:17: sparse: got int >> drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:152:16: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer >> drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:534:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different modifiers) @@ expected unsigned int *sft_clk @@ got unsigned int const * @@ drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:534:20: sparse: expected unsigned int *sft_clk drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:534:20: sparse: got unsigned int const * >> drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:535:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different modifiers) @@ expected unsigned int *clk_sel @@ got unsigned int const * @@ drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:535:20: sparse: expected unsigned int *clk_sel drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:535:20: sparse: got unsigned int const * drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:540:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different modifiers) @@ expected unsigned int *sft_clk @@ got unsigned int const * @@ drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:540:20: sparse: expected unsigned int *sft_clk drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:540:20: sparse: got unsigned int const * drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:541:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different modifiers) @@ expected unsigned int *clk_sel @@ got unsigned int const * @@ drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:541:20: sparse: expected unsigned int *clk_sel drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c:541:20: sparse: got unsigned int const * vim +150 drivers/gpio/gpio-npcm-sgpio.c 134 135 static void __iomem *bank_reg(struct npcm_sgpio *gpio, 136 const struct npcm_sgpio_bank *bank, 137 const enum npcm_sgpio_reg reg) 138 { 139 switch (reg) { 140 case READ_DATA: 141 return gpio->base + bank->rdata_reg; 142 case WRITE_DATA: 143 return gpio->base + bank->wdata_reg; 144 case EVENT_CFG: 145 return gpio->base + bank->event_config; 146 case EVENT_STS: 147 return gpio->base + bank->event_status; 148 default: 149 /* actually if code runs to here, it's an error case */ > 150 dev_WARN(true, "Getting here is an error condition"); 151 } > 152 return 0; 153 } 154 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
