On 06/12/2023 14:10, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: >>> >>> If you say they are wrong, why are they approved in the first place? >> Because we don't have time to keep digging what the driver is doing and >> what is claimed in DT. Some people don't even CC us on the driver. >> > > OK. How about, "qcom,broken-refclk"? This reflects the fact that the default > refclk operation is broken on this platform, so the OS should be prepared for > it (by keeping it always on). > Sounds very good to me. Best regards, Krzysztof
