On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:00:10PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: >> of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect DT property to PCA954x mux driver >> >> Add idle-disconnect device tree property to PCA954x mux driver. The new property >> forces the multiplexer to disconnect child buses in idle state. This is used, for >> example, when there are several multiplexers on the same bus and the devices on >> the underlying buses might have same I2C addresses. > > Basically OK. Question to DT maintainers: "idle-disconnect", > "i2c-mux-idle-disconnect", or is there another existing binding we could > use? Not that I'm aware of. If this is specific to i2c-mux's then I'd go with the latter. Either way, this should go in a common i2c or i2c-mux binding doc. Alternatively, couldn't the kernel do this automatically when the above conditions happen? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
