Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: Add QUP5 SPI node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: Add QUP5 SPI node
From: Chukun Pan <amadeus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:30:03 +0800
Cc: agross@xxxxxxxxxx, amadeus@xxxxxxxxxx, andersson@xxxxxxxxxx, conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <67ecd9c3-40e3-40c6-b904-9898556af409@linaro.org>

> Why are you sending this separately from the UART patch?

Because they are independent and have no dependencies.
Should I send these in the same thread?

Thanks,
Chukun

-- 
2.25.1

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: Add QUP5 SPI node
  - From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/msm: Introduce display support for SM8650
Next by Date: [PATCH v5 0/2] mutiple selectable capabilities in tcpm
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: Add QUP5 SPI node
Next by thread: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: Add QUP5 SPI node
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Device Tree Compilter] [Device Tree Spec] [Linux Driver Backports] [Video for Linux] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux PCI Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Yosemite Backpacking]

Powered by Linux