On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 15:23 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:20:19 +0100 > Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > When calling ad9467_set_scale(), multiple calls to ad9467_spi_write() > > are done which means we need to properly protect the whole operation so > > we are sure we will be in a sane state if two concurrent calls occur. > > > > Fixes: ad6797120238 ("iio: adc: ad9467: add support AD9467 ADC") > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > > index 04474dbfa631..91821dee03b7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > > * > > * Copyright 2012-2020 Analog Devices Inc. > > */ > > - > > +#include <linux/cleanup.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/mutex.h> > > #include <linux/device.h> > > @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ struct ad9467_state { > > unsigned int output_mode; > > > > struct gpio_desc *pwrdown_gpio; > > + /* protect against concurrent accesses to the device */ > Not very specific. Concurrent access usually fine at granularity of > individual read/write as the bus locks protect it. What state > is actually being protected? A shared buffer or some state that we > need to ensure remains consistent between driver and device? At this point not any buffer/data... Just making sure things remain consistent (typical case when you have multiple reads/writes to the device). That's why a tried to emphasize "accesses to the device". Maybe I should make it explicit I'm speaking about multiple reads/writes. - Nuno Sá >