On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 07:25:25PM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > The DA9061 watchdog is identical to DA9062 watchdog, so no driver changes > are required. The fallback compatible string "dlg,da9062-watchdog" will be > used on DA9061 watchdog. > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: > * New patch > --- > .../bindings/watchdog/dlg,da9062-watchdog.yaml | 11 ++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dlg,da9062-watchdog.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dlg,da9062-watchdog.yaml > index f058628bb632..2b71fdb9251c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dlg,da9062-watchdog.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dlg,da9062-watchdog.yaml > @@ -14,9 +14,14 @@ allOf: > > properties: > compatible: > - enum: > - - dlg,da9061-watchdog > - - dlg,da9062-watchdog > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - enum: > + - dlg,da9062-watchdog > + - items: > + - enum: > + - dlg,da9061-watchdog If there is no da9064 on the horizon, I'd just make this const. > + - const: dlg,da9062-watchdog # da9062-watchdog fallback The comment here is just noise IMO. Otherwise, LGTM.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
