On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 09:50:17AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 11/30/23 07:42, Stefan Wahren wrote: > > BCM2711 SoC use a power domain for the xHCI. So allow supplying this > > domain in bindings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-xhci.yaml | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-xhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-xhci.yaml > > index 594ebb3ee432..e48beaff7d0d 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-xhci.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-xhci.yaml > > @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ properties: > > - const: core > > - const: reg > > > > + power-domains: > > + maxItems: 1 > > That works, I am not sure whether we want to key off based upon the > compatible string, but either way: If by "key it off" you mean selectively permit "power-domains" based on the compatible, I think that would be a good idea. There is no bcm2711 specific compatible though at present and I figured there could well be god-knows-how-many other users of generic-xhci out there that also make use of power domains, which is why I did not request it of Stefan.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
