Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/23/23 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/11/2023 10:39, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:

ok i will use '
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9876ee0dd1e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
Any particular reason why do you need 3-clause BSD? Checkpatch asks for
different one, because that one clause is just annoying.
Yes, the same file can also be used in other components, such as
TF-A/OPTEE, and can therefore have a dual licence.
That's not what I asked. I asked: why do you choose different dual
license then we ask for (as expressed in checkpatch).


Sorry for the delay, i checked with our licensing experts and we concluded that there was no particular reason to use BSD-3-clause instead of the BSD-2-clause model.


I'm sending back a new version under GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause license model.

Best Regards

Gabriel


Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux