On 11/23/23 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/11/2023 10:39, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
ok i will use '
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9876ee0dd1e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
Any particular reason why do you need 3-clause BSD? Checkpatch asks for
different one, because that one clause is just annoying.
Yes, the same file can also be used in other components, such as
TF-A/OPTEE, and can therefore have a dual licence.
That's not what I asked. I asked: why do you choose different dual
license then we ask for (as expressed in checkpatch).
Sorry for the delay, i checked with our licensing experts and we
concluded that there was no particular reason to use BSD-3-clause
instead of the BSD-2-clause model.
I'm sending back a new version under GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
license model.
Best Regards
Gabriel
Best regards,
Krzysztof
