* Michael Walle <mwalle@xxxxxxxxxx> [231127 14:31]: > + dt maintainers > > > > I actually have the same fix, but with one additional detail, which > > > I'm > > > unsure about though: This looks at the data-lanes property of the > > > *remote* > > > endpoint whereas other bridge drivers (see tc358767, ti-sn65dsi83, > > > lt8912b, > > > anx7625) look at the local endpoint and I'm not sure what is correct. > > > > Yes I've been wondering about that too. Let's just move it over to the > > bridge node? We could produce a warning if the dsi host node has the > > data-lanes property.. No current in kernel users AFAIK. > > I haven't found any in-tree users either. In my patch, I first try the > remote > end and then the local end. But thinking more about it I don't think > this is correct. Maybe we can do it the other way around, first try > data-lanes of the local endpoint and if not found, then try the remote > one. That way, we would at least be backwards compatible in the driver. > And for the dt-bindings, make it mandatory to have a local data-lanes. OK sounds good to me. Tony
