On 25.11.2023 16:17, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 25/11/2023 14:27, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> The MPM hardware is accessible to us from the ARM CPUs through a shared >> memory region (RPM MSG RAM) that's also concurrently accessed by other >> kinds of cores on the system (like modem, ADSP etc.). Modeling this >> relation in a (somewhat) sane manner in the device tree basically >> requires us to either present the MPM as a child of said memory region >> (which makes little sense, as a mapped memory carveout is not a bus), >> define nodes which bleed their register spaces into one another, or >> passing their slice of the MSG RAM through some kind of a property. >> >> Go with the third option and add a way to map a region passed through >> the "qcom,rpm-msg-ram" property as our register space. >> >> The current way of using 'reg' is preserved for ABI reasons. >> >> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c >> index 7124565234a5..7115e3056aa5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ >> #include <linux/mailbox_client.h> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/of.h> >> +#include <linux/of_address.h> >> #include <linux/of_platform.h> >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> #include <linux/pm_domain.h> >> @@ -322,8 +323,10 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent) >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> struct irq_domain *parent_domain; >> struct generic_pm_domain *genpd; >> + struct device_node *msgram_np; >> struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv; >> unsigned int pin_cnt; >> + struct resource res; >> int i, irq; >> int ret; >> @@ -374,9 +377,21 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent) >> raw_spin_lock_init(&priv->lock); >> - priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); >> - if (IS_ERR(priv->base)) >> - return PTR_ERR(priv->base); >> + /* If we have a handle to an RPM message ram partition, use it. */ >> + msgram_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "qcom,rpm-msg-ram", 0); >> + if (msgram_np) { >> + ret = of_address_to_resource(msgram_np, 0, &res); > > You are capturing the return value but doing nothing with it. Oops you're right > > One of > > if (ret) { > of_node_put(msgram_np); > return ret; > } > > or just drop the ret = > > if you are sure of_address_to_resource() can never return an error for your use-case. Never say never! Konrad