On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 02:50:58PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On 24/11/2023 13:36, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 09:41:15AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > The amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog is a feature of the simple-mfd
> > > amlogic,meson-axg-hhi-sysctrl system control register zone which is an
> > > intermixed registers zone, thus it's very hard to define clear ranges for
> > > each SoC controlled features even if possible.
> > >
> > > The amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog was wrongly documented as an independent
> > > register range, which is not the reality, thus fix the bindings by dropping
> > > the reg property now it's referred from amlogic,meson-gx-hhi-sysctrl.yaml
> > > and documented as a subnode of amlogic,meson-axg-hhi-sysctrl.
> > >
> > > Also drop the unnecessary example, the top level bindings example should
> > > be enough.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 76ab79f9726c ("dt-bindings: phy: add Amlogic G12A Analog MIPI D-PHY bindings")
> > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I feel like I left a tag on this one before, but I can't remember.
> > Perhaps I missed the conclusion to the discussion to the discussion with
> > Rob about whether having "reg" was desirable that lead to a tag being
> > dropped?
>
> I checked again and nope, not tag, but Rob's question was legitimate and I reworded
> and clarified the commit message following your reviews.
> On the other side you suggested a Fixes tag, which I added.
>
> The rewording is about why reg doesn't make sense on the nature of the memory
> region and it doesn't make sense here like other similar nodes.
Okay, I thought that I had given you one. Perhaps I forgot to send, or
Rob's message came in between me asking about the Fixes tag & replying
with an Ack. Sorry about that,
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
