On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Arnaud Ebalard <arno@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Arnaud Ebalard <arno@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch fixes DT vendor-prefixes.txt documentation to reference
>>> isil (NASDAQ symbol and the most used prefix inside the kernel) for
>>> Intersil.
>>>
>>> It reverts 7c75c1d5e72b ("dt-bindings: Document deprecated device
>>> vendor name to fix related warning").
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ebalard <arno@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Applied for 3.20. Thanks.
>>
>> While there are not interdepencies here, it probably would have been
>> better to keep this series all together.
>
> This was the main reason my v0 was in a single patch. I think I then got
> some comment to split things in different patches so that the various
> maintainers have their words to say. But I'll try and follow your
> approach next time.
I didn't say a single patch, but merge the series together. A separate
commit per maintainer is generally preferred. You just have to be
clear whether you are looking for just acks or to take individual
patches.
I should have chimed in earlier as well, but I missed this initially.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
