On 22/11/2023 03:54, Jyan Chou [周芷安] wrote: >> + clocks = <&cc 22>, <&cc 26>, <&cc 121>, <&cc 122>; >> + clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "vp0", "vp1"; > >> Where is the DTS implementing this binding? > >> I said it once: > >>> I asked you to test the bindings. This also means that you must test >>> your DTS against bindings. Your bindings, DTS and driver do not match, >>> therefore let's be a bit more clear: >>> >>> NAK, till you upstream your DTS. > >> I still do not see DTS anywhere. Please link it. > > Sorry for asking. Which dts do we need to link it? The device tree we use for our SOC? > > or realtek,rtd-dw-cqe-emmc.example.dts? Thanks. The patch adding this device node to any upstream DTS. I am not speaking about example, but about upstream DTS using this MMC. As I wrote last time, I don't believe you test bindings and DTS and I had proofs of that. Therefore I expect you to upstream DTS of your product. Best regards, Krzysztof
