On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 11:09 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > On 20/11/2023 11:02, yu-chang.lee wrote: > > For MT8188, VPPSYS0 and VPPSYS1 are 2 display pipes with > > hardware differences in power domains, clocks and subsystem counts, > > which should be probed from mtk-mmsys driver to populate device by > > platform_device_register_data then start its own clock driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: yu-chang.lee <yu-chang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Change in v4: > > - Squashed binding patches > > - This patch is based on [1] > > [1] soc: mediatek: mmsys: Add support for MT8188 VPPSYS > > - > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20231117054345.15859-1-yu-chang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > This probably should stay part of previous patchset. Why splitting > it? > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Thank you for your time and effort. I misunderstood that you want me to send the binding patches as a independent serie in previous discussion. Only until now I squashed them, but the driver patch has already been submitted... Should I resend all of these pathes as a serie again? Thanks, Best Regards, yuchang
