> >On 17/11/2023 06:07, Inochi Amaoto wrote: >> The timer registers of aclint don't follow the clint layout and can >> be mapped on any different offset. As sg2042 uses separated timer >> and mswi for its clint, it should follow the aclint spec and have >> separated registers. >> >> The previous patch introduced a new type of T-HEAD aclint timer which >> has clint timer layout. Although it has the clint timer layout, it >> should follow the aclint spec and uses the separated mtime and mtimecmp >> regs. So a ABI change is needed to make the timer fit the aclint spec. >> >> To make T-HEAD aclint timer more closer to the aclint spec, use >> regs-names to represent the mtimecmp register, which can avoid hack >> for unsupport mtime register of T-HEAD aclint timer. >> > >I don't understand this reasoning. You had one entry, you still have one >entry. Adding reg-names (not regs-names) does not change it. > If no "reg-names", all the register of ACLINT should be defined. However, T-HEAD aclint timer of sg2042 only supports mtimecmp register. If no extra prompt is provided for the SBI, it will fail to recognize aclint timer registers when parsing the aclint node with one reg entry. There is another way to avoid this by using an empty entry to identify unsupported mtime, but Conor have already rejected this. See [1]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231114-skedaddle-precinct-66c8897227bb@squawk/ [1]
