On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 08:53, Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No HTML mail on kernel mailing lists, please. Some developers can have
'MIME => junk' mail filters.
And replying to the HTML mail messes up quotation level.
> On 11/4/2023 3:52 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 20:49, Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add qcm6490 devicetree file for QCM6490 IDP and QCM6490 RB3
> platform. QCM6490 is derived from SC7280 meant for various
> form factor including IoT.
>
> Supported features are, as of now:
> * Debug UART
> * eMMC (only in IDP)
> * USB
>
> Co-developed-by: Naina Mehta <quic_nainmeht@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Naina Mehta <quic_nainmeht@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 33 ++
> .../boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-iot-common.dtsi | 291 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-rb3.dts | 26 ++
> 4 files changed, 352 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-iot-common.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-rb3.dts
>
>
> [...]
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-rb3.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-rb3.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5b4c2826ac5c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-rb3.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +/* PM7250B is configured to use SID8/9 */
> +#define PM7250B_SID 8
> +#define PM7250B_SID1 9
> +
> +#include "qcm6490-iot-common.dtsi"
> +#include "pm7250b.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. QCM6490 RB3";
>
> Is this a marketing name of the platform?
>
>
> Sorry for the confusion, QCS6490 RB3gen2 is the correct marketing name for this board.
> Will correct this in the next patchset.
Then it is probably "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Robotics RB3gen2"?
> + compatible = "qcom,qcm6490-rb3", "qcom,qcm6490";
>
> chassis-type = ?
>
>
> No, this won't be needed as it is an evaluation board and will be used for multiple use cases.
> So, we don't want to mark it to any specific type.
Then it is "embedded". We should probably update existing
dragonboards/RB boards to have this type too.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
