Hi Jaehoon, On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/31/2014 03:43 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> From: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> ciu_div may not be common value for all speed mode. >> So, it needs to be attached to CLKSEL timing. >> This also introduce a new compatibale 'dw-mshc-hs200-timing' >> for selecting hs200 timing value >> >> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt | 15 ++-- >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 81 ++++++++++++++------ >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt >> index ee4fc05..06455de 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt >> @@ -23,10 +23,6 @@ Required Properties: >> - "samsung,exynos7-dw-mshc-smu": for controllers with Samsung Exynos7 >> specific extensions having an SMU. >> >> -* samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div: Specifies the divider value for the card interface >> - unit (ciu) clock. This property is applicable only for Exynos5 SoC's and >> - ignored for Exynos4 SoC's. The valid range of divider value is 0 to 7. >> - >> * samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing: Specifies the value of CIU clock phase shift value >> in transmit mode and CIU clock phase shift value in receive mode for single >> data rate mode operation. Refer notes below for the order of the cells and the >> @@ -37,11 +33,16 @@ Required Properties: >> data rate mode operation. Refer notes below for the order of the cells and the >> valid values. >> >> +* samsung,dw-mshc-hs200-timing: Similar with dw-mshc-sdr-timing. > > What does this comment mean? "Similar with dw-mshc-sdr-timing" > how about adding the comment "optional"? > > And i think this timing doesn't need, we can reuse the sdr-timing or ddr-timing. > Because it's re-configurated at tuning time, isn't? > Ok, I will rework/drop this patch, I will try to use existing binding as much as mush possible. >> + >> Notes for the sdr-timing and ddr-timing values: >> >> The order of the cells should be >> - First Cell: CIU clock phase shift value for tx mode. >> - Second Cell: CIU clock phase shift value for rx mode. >> + - Thrid Cell: Specifies the divider value for the card interface >> + unit (ciu) clock. This property is applicable only for Exynos5 SoC's and >> + ignored for Exynos4 SoC's. The valid range of divider value is 0 to 7. >> >> Valid values for SDR and DDR CIU clock timing for Exynos5250: >> - valid value for tx phase shift and rx phase shift is 0 to 7. >> @@ -79,8 +80,8 @@ Example: >> broken-cd; >> fifo-depth = <0x80>; >> card-detect-delay = <200>; >> - samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>; >> - samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>; >> - samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>; >> + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3 3>; >> + samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2 3>; >> + samsung,dw-mshc-hs200-timing = <0 2 3>; >> bus-width = <8>; >> }; >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c >> index 12a5eaa..be6530e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data { >> u8 ciu_div; >> u32 sdr_timing; >> u32 ddr_timing; >> + u32 hs200_timing; >> u32 cur_speed; >> }; >> >> @@ -71,6 +72,21 @@ static struct dw_mci_exynos_compatible { >> }, >> }; >> >> +static inline u8 dw_mci_exynos_get_ciu_div(struct dw_mci *host) >> +{ >> + struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv; >> + >> + if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4412) >> + return EXYNOS4412_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV; >> + else if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4210) >> + return EXYNOS4210_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV; >> + else if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7 || >> + priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7_SMU) >> + return SDMMC_CLKSEL_GET_DIV(mci_readl(host, CLKSEL64)) + 1; >> + else >> + return SDMMC_CLKSEL_GET_DIV(mci_readl(host, CLKSEL)) + 1; > > If need this, I think more readable that use the switch-case statement. how about? > > switch (priv->ctrl_type) { > case DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4412: > return EXYNOS4412_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV; > case DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4210: > return EXYNOS4210_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV; > case DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7: > case DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7_SMU: > return SDMMC_CLKSEL_GET_DIV(mci_readl(host, CLKSEL64)) + 1; > default: > return SDMMC_CLKSEL_GET_DIV(mci_readl(host, CLKSEL)) + 1; > } > > >> +} >> + >> static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host) >> { >> struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv; >> @@ -85,6 +101,8 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host) >> SDMMC_MPSCTRL_NON_SECURE_WRITE_BIT); >> } >> >> + priv->ciu_div = dw_mci_exynos_get_ciu_div(host); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> @@ -92,7 +110,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_clock(struct dw_mci *host) >> { >> struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv; >> >> - host->bus_hz /= (priv->ciu_div + 1); >> + host->bus_hz /= priv->ciu_div; >> >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -177,9 +195,14 @@ static void dw_mci_exynos_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) >> struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv; >> unsigned int wanted = ios->clock; >> unsigned long actual; >> - u8 div = priv->ciu_div + 1; >> >> - if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) { >> + if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200) { >> + if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7 || >> + priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7_SMU) >> + mci_writel(host, CLKSEL64, priv->hs200_timing); >> + else >> + mci_writel(host, CLKSEL, priv->hs200_timing); >> + } else if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) { >> if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7 || >> priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7_SMU) >> mci_writel(host, CLKSEL64, priv->ddr_timing); >> @@ -208,6 +231,7 @@ static void dw_mci_exynos_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) >> wanted = EXYNOS_CCLKIN_MIN; >> >> if (wanted != priv->cur_speed) { >> + u8 div = dw_mci_exynos_get_ciu_div(host); >> int ret = clk_set_rate(host->ciu_clk, wanted * div); >> if (ret) >> dev_warn(host->dev, >> @@ -220,14 +244,34 @@ static void dw_mci_exynos_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) >> } >> } >> >> +static int dw_mci_exynos_dt_populate_timing(struct dw_mci *host, >> + unsigned int ctrl_type, >> + const char *propname, >> + u32 *out_values) >> +{ >> + struct device_node *np = host->dev->of_node; >> + u32 timing[3]; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, propname, timing, 3); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + if (ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4412 || >> + ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4210) >> + timing[2] = 0; > > Is it set to 0 into dt-file? > >> + >> + *out_values = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], timing[2]); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> + >> static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host) >> { >> struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv; >> struct device_node *np = host->dev->of_node; >> - u32 timing[2]; >> - u32 div = 0; >> - int idx; >> - int ret; >> + int idx, ret; >> >> priv = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!priv) >> @@ -238,29 +282,20 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host) >> priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type; >> } >> >> - if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4412) >> - priv->ciu_div = EXYNOS4412_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV - 1; >> - else if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4210) >> - priv->ciu_div = EXYNOS4210_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV - 1; >> - else { >> - of_property_read_u32(np, "samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div", &div); >> - priv->ciu_div = div; >> - } >> - >> - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, >> - "samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing", timing, 2); >> + ret = dw_mci_exynos_dt_populate_timing(host, priv->ctrl_type, >> + "samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing", &priv->sdr_timing); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> - priv->sdr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div); >> - >> - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, >> - "samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing", timing, 2); >> + ret = dw_mci_exynos_dt_populate_timing(host, priv->ctrl_type, >> + "samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing", &priv->ddr_timing); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> - priv->ddr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div); >> + dw_mci_exynos_dt_populate_timing(host, priv->ctrl_type, >> + "samsung,dw-mshc-hs200-timing", &priv->hs200_timing); > > hs200-timing is optional, so it needs not to check return value, right? > > Best Regards, > Jaehoon Chung > >> host->priv = priv; >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.h >> index 7872ce5..c04ecef 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.h >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.h >> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ >> #define SDMMC_CLKSEL_CCLK_DRIVE(x) (((x) & 7) << 16) >> #define SDMMC_CLKSEL_CCLK_DIVIDER(x) (((x) & 7) << 24) >> #define SDMMC_CLKSEL_GET_DRV_WD3(x) (((x) >> 16) & 0x7) >> +#define SDMMC_CLKSEL_GET_DIV(x) (((x) >> 24) & 0x7) >> #define SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(x, y, z) (SDMMC_CLKSEL_CCLK_SAMPLE(x) | \ >> SDMMC_CLKSEL_CCLK_DRIVE(y) | \ >> SDMMC_CLKSEL_CCLK_DIVIDER(z)) >> > -- Regards, Alim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html