Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: pwm: ti,pwm-omap-dmtimer: Update binding for yaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [231114 10:36]:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:27:06AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > +  ti,timers:
> > +    description: Timer instance phandle for the PWM
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > +
> > +  ti,prescaler:
> > +    description: |
> > +      Legacy clock prescaler for timer. The timer counter is prescaled
> > +      with 2^n where n is the prescaler.
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +    enum: [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]
> > +    deprecated: true
> > +
> > +  ti,clock-source:
> > +    description: |
> > +      Legacy clock for timer, please use assigned-clocks instead.
> > +      0x00 - high-frequency system clock (timer_sys_ck)
> > +      0x01 - 32-kHz always-on clock (timer_32k_ck)
> > +      0x02 - external clock (timer_ext_ck, OMAP2 only)
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +    enum: [ 0, 1, 2 ]
> > +    deprecated: true
> 
> Someone could collect some bonus points by converting these:
> 
> 	$ git grep ti,clock-source arch/arm/boot
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am335x-guardian.dts:          ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am3517-evm.dts:               ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/logicpd-torpedo-baseboard.dtsi:               ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/motorola-mapphone-common.dtsi:                ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/motorola-mapphone-common.dtsi:                ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap3-gta04.dtsi:             ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap3-n900.dts:               ti,clock-source = <0x00>; /* timer_sys_ck */
> 
> (I verified, this are all about this binding.)

Agreed, we should update all those.

> otherwise LGTM:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Should this go via the pwm tree or via some arm or omap or dt tree?

Please take this via the pwm tree, there are no dependencies.

Regards,

Tony





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux