Hi Michael,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 03:33:34PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
> Hi Mehdi,
>
> Sorry, forgot one thing:
>
> On 11/8/23 17:38, Mehdi Djait wrote:
> > +static int cif_subdev_notifier(struct cif_device *cif_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct v4l2_async_notifier *ntf = &cif_dev->notifier;
> > + struct device *dev = cif_dev->dev;
> > + struct v4l2_async_connection *asd;
> > + struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint vep = {
> > + .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_PARALLEL,
>
> This is surprising. I had to set this to V4L2_MBUS_UNKNOWN, otherwise
> v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse would yield -ENXIO, which indicates a bus
> type mismatch. Does this really work for your (BT.656, right?) setup?
>
Yes it works.
> I think we should get the bus type from the device tree, right?
>
I am looking into this.
> Thanks and best regards,
> Michael
>
I assume you have a "bus-type = <MEDIA_BUS_TYPE_BT656>;" in the device
tree definition of your endpoint ? This caused the mismatch as the
v4l2_fwnode_endpoint is set to PARALLEL
--
Kind Regards
Mehdi Djait
