Hi Linus,
linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2023 15:33:53 +0100:
> The standard property for describing the band width of a NAND
> memory is "nand-bus-width" not "bank-width". The new bindings
> support both so make Linux check both in priority order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpio.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpio.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpio.c
> index 5553101c709c..d5bd245b0c0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpio.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,15 @@ static int gpio_nand_get_config(struct device *dev,
> {
> u32 val;
>
> - if (!device_property_read_u32(dev, "bank-width", &val)) {
> + /* The preferred binding takes precedence */
> + if (!device_property_read_u32(dev, "nand-bus-width", &val)) {
> + if (val == 16) {
> + chip->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> + } else if (val != 8) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid nand-bus-width %u\n", val);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + } else if (!device_property_read_u32(dev, "bank-width", &val)) {
> if (val == 2) {
> chip->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> } else if (val != 1) {
>
I'm not sure this is actually needed. I believe of_get_nand_bus_width
is already called (nand_scan_ident -> rawnand_dt_init) and will set the
NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 flag automatically. So the above 'if' is already a
fallback. Maybe you can add a comment if you want to make this more
explicit that the real property is nand-bus-width and the property
parsed in the driver is for backward compatibility only?
Thanks,
Miquèl
