On 31.10.2023 13:03, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Hello,
you're missing:
- dt-bindings (make dtbs_check is unhappy)
- a commit message
- Co-developed-by for Sricharan
status should read "okay" instead, but in this case it's unnecessary
as you're defining the node and lack of the status property also means
that device is enabled
however
this ECC engine seems to be a part of the NAND controller, so it's
unlikely that the DT maintainers will agree for it to have a separate
node
Konrad
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> index 5f83ee42a719..b44acb1fac74 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> @@ -336,6 +336,11 @@ sdhc_1: mmc@7804000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + bch: qpic_ecc {
> + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ecc";
> + status = "ok";
> + }
> +
> blsp_dma: dma-controller@7884000 {
> compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
> reg = <0x07884000 0x2b000>;
