On 29/10/2023 22:08, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > On 10/29/23 13:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: >>> The usage of 'select' doesn't seem to have any influence on how this >>> binding schema is applied to the nodes, hence remove it. >>> >> >> It has. Why do you think it doesn't? You should see new errors from >> dwmac schema. > > This patch came as a result of testing both variants (w/ and w/o > 'select') with several different compatible strings and seeing > consistent output: > > - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac", "invalid"; > - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac"; > - "invalid", "snps,dwmac-5.20"; > - "invalid" > > Did I miss something? Testing all bindings? The select is there to prevent matching unrelated bindings. Best regards, Krzysztof
