Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: Export special values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Edward,

equu@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:46:08 +0800:

> There are special "offset" and "size" values defined and documented in
> linux/mtd/partitions.h:
> 
> /* consume as much as possible, leaving size after the end of partition. */
>  #define MTDPART_OFS_RETAIN (uint64_t)(-3)
> 
> /* the partition will start at the next erase block. */
>  #define MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK (uint64_t)(-2)
> 
> /* the partition will start where the previous one ended. */
>  #define MTDPART_OFS_APPEND (uint64_t)(-1)
> 
> (Though not explicitly, they are compared against variables in uint64_t
> in drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c, so they had better be considered as such.)
> 
> /* the partition will extend to the end of the master MTD device. */
>  #define MTDPART_SIZ_FULL (0)
> 
> These special values could be used to define partitions automatically
> fitting to the size of the master MTD device at runtime.
> 
> However, these values used not to be exported to dt-bindings, thus
> seldom used before, since they might have been only used in numeric form,
> such as "(-1) (-3)" for MTDPART_OFS_RETAIN.
> 
> Now, they are exported in dt-bindings/mtd/partitions.h as 32-bit cell
> values, so 2-cell addressed should be defined to use special offset values,
> such as "MTDPART_OFS_SPECIAL MTDPART_OFS_RETAIN" for MTDPART_OFS_RETAIN in
> linux/mtd/partitions.h. An example is added to fixed-partitions.yaml.
> 
> Edward Chow (2):
>   dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: Export special values
>   dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: Document special values
> 
>  .../mtd/partitions/fixed-partitions.yaml      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |  2 ++
>  include/dt-bindings/mtd/partitions.h          | 15 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/mtd/partitions.h
> 
> --
> 2.42.0

I've expressed my feelings regarding this series in your v1 but it
feels like you are completely ignoring them. As a reminder, I am
opposed to exporting these flags. They are outdated, legacy, have
never been used in DT and were never meant to be.

Thanks, Miquèl





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux