On 23/10/2023 08:50, Luka Panio wrote: >> Did you base your work on these files? This would explain the license, >> but then please include original copyrights. > No, but the sm8250.dtsi that I do include has that license. Same as > all other sm8250 device's dts's so i thought mine should not be > different? Including a file does not make your work derivative (at least usually), so either you based your work on existing file or you created a new file. If you created a new file, then I would propose to license this the same as we license bindings, so: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > >> Please do not trim the content that much. How can I know to what you >> refer here? What was in original code? 0x24? > Sorry, indeed I did mean 0x34, but I am not really sure what I > can/should do about that, in the and only reason for it is to make > bootloader happy, should i mention that as a comment? No, I just wanted to be sure you used valid value. Few more boards use decimal 34. Best regards, Krzysztof
