On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:04:46PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:03:42AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Fix some errors in the Marvell MV88E6xxx switch descriptions: > > - The top node had no address size or cells. > > - switch0@0 is not OK, should be switch@0. > > - The ports node should have port@0 etc children, no > > plural "ports". > > > > This serves as an example of fixes needed for introducing a > > schema for the bindings, but the patch can simply be applied. > > In patch 2, you mention that things should be named ethernet-switch and > ethernet-port. As you're renaming the nodes in this patch, wouldn't it > make sense to use those names instead now, rather than at some point in > the future a patch that converts to these names? I agree, and I was wondering the same thing.
