On 19/10/2023 08:06, Praveen Teja Kundanala wrote: > Add nvmem DT nodes for ZynqMP SOC > > Signed-off-by: Praveen Teja Kundanala <praveen.teja.kundanala@xxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi > index b61fc99cd911..b7433e6b9d6c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi > @@ -194,14 +194,69 @@ zynqmp_power: zynqmp-power { > mbox-names = "tx", "rx"; > }; > > - nvmem_firmware { > + nvmem-firmware { Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification: https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation > compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem-fw"; It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run `make dtbs_check W=1` (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/ for instructions). > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > > - soc_revision: soc_revision@0 { > + soc_revision: soc-revision@0 { > reg = <0x0 0x4>; > }; Wasn't this fixed already by Michal? Best regards, Krzysztof