Hi Angelo,
On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 11:10 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > static const struct of_device_id mtk_ovl_adaptor_comp_dt_ids[] =
> > {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-padding", .data = (void
> > *)OVL_ADAPTOR_TYPE_PADDING },
>
> Uhm, for consistency I'd call this "mediatek,mt8188-disp-padding"
> (you don't have
> to drop Reviewed-by tags for such a change, not here and not in the
> yaml commit),
> but it's fine if you have reasons against that.
>
> So, regardless of this being changed or not
>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-disp-ethdr", .data = (void
> > *)OVL_ADAPTOR_TYPE_ETHDR },
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-disp-merge", .data = (void
> > *)OVL_ADAPTOR_TYPE_MERGE },
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vdo1-rdma", .data = (void
> > *)OVL_ADAPTOR_TYPE_MDP_RDMA },
>
Thanks for pointing this out. Had changed Padding driver's name to
"mtk-disp-padding", but I just notice that Padding will also be used by
MDP and they will share the same driver with display. Should we change
the name again or is it just fine to use "mtk-disp-padding"?
Thanks,
Shawn
