Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2023-09-15 05:19:56) > On 14.09.2023 08:59, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote: > > GPLL, NSS crypto PLL clock rates are fixed and shouldn't be scaled based > > on the request from dependent clocks. Doing so will result in the > > unexpected behaviour. So drop the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag from the PLL > > clocks. > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fixes: b8e7e519625f ("clk: qcom: ipq8074: add remaining PLL’s") > > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > Stephen, do you think there should be some sort of error > or at least warning thrown when SET_RATE_PARENT is used with > RO ops? > Sure? How would that be implemented?