On 18/10/2023 14:37, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>> On 18/10/2023 13:31, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>>> As CV180x and CV181x have the identical layouts, it is OK to use the
>>> cv1800b basic device tree for the whole series.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} | 0
>>> 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>> rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} (100%)
>>>
>>
>> If nothing breaks by this commit, means the file is not used, so how did
>> it end up in the kernel?
>>
>
> This commit breaks the including file cv1800b-milkv-duo.dts, which is
> fixed in the next patch. For cv1800b, it only needs to set compatible
> strings. The cv1800b and cv1812h have identical layout.
You must preserve bisectability.
>
> I use this commit to avoid wired output provided by git and make the
> change more clear.
Don't do this. Previous patch was ok and readable. I don't understand
how this split helps (except breaking bisectability).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
