> Maybe this has been discussed before but I didn't find it. I'm wondering > the reason of adding each plic and clint binding for each SoC, can we > just use the thead,c900-plic for plic? > FWICT, arm gic dt usage follows this way, there's no binding for each SoC's > gic but directly use "arm,gic-v3" and so on. I'm not aware of why the gic-v3 is done like this, but having different compatibles allows differentiation between implementations/integrations of this interrupt controller. I think having that ability is especially helpful given T-Head have open-sourced a bunch of their IP.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
