On 12-10-23, 10:40, Christian Marangi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 09:12:41AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 10-10-23, 12:02, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 02-10-23, 21:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > > This is a split of APQ8064 cpufreq series, as requested by Viresh. This > > > > series includes only opp and cpufreq parts, with the DT and soc parts > > > > being split to a separate patchset. > > > > > > > > Each core has independent power and frequency control. Additionally the > > > > L2 cache is scaled to follow the CPU frequencies (failure to do so > > > > results in strange semi-random crashes). > > > > > > > > Core voltage is controlled through the SAW2 devices, one for each core. > > > > The L2 has two regulators, vdd-mem and vdd-dig. > > > > > > > > Changes since v4: > > > > - Reordered variables in qcom_cpufreq_init() (Konrad) > > > > - Fixed of_platform_device_create() error check (Konrad) > > > > - Dropped unused ret variable in qcom_cpufreq_apq8064_name_version() (Konrad) > > > > > > Applied. Thanks. > > > > Since these are causing build issues, and it isn't entirely clear what's the > > right approach for now, I have dropped the changes from my branch to avoid any > > further issues. You don't need to resend these, lets finalize a solution and > > then I can apply them again. > > > > Hi we have a qcom-cpufreq series that depends on this (or better say we > have rebased it on top of these changes to prevent merge conflicts) That shouldn't be an issue I guess, we are likely not going to change anything in these patches but something else: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231011112726.166052-1-dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx/ > Can you link where this was applied, also can I help in fixing the > compile error to speed things up? I applied them here earlier. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git opp/linux-next -- viresh
