On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:29:19PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45:09PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > During a recent cleanup of the arm64 DTs it has become clear that > > the handling of PPIs in xxxx_set_type() is incorrect. The ARM TRMs > > for GICv2 and later allow for "implementation defined" support for > > setting the edge or level type of the PPI interrupts and don't restrict > > the activation level of the signal. Current ARM implementations > > do restrict the PPI level type to IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, but licensees > > of the IP can decide to shoot themselves in the foot at any time. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Made a stupid mistake in v2 and got my bit test confused with logical test. > > Gentle ping! > > Any comments here? Russell, are you OK with this approach? Now that the holidays are over, I'd like to get some feedback from Marc at a minimum... thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
