On Wednesday 31 December 2014 13:03:27 Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> +
> + memory@00000000 {
> + device_type = "memory";
> + reg = <0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x80000000>;
> + /* board 0, socket 0, no specific core */
> + arm,associativity = <0 0 0xffff>;
> + };
> +
> + memory@10000000000 {
> + device_type = "memory";
> + reg = <0x100 0x00000000 0x0 0x80000000>;
> + /* board 1, socket 0, no specific core */
> + arm,associativity = <1 0 0xffff>;
> + };
> +};
So no memory in any other socket?
> + cpu@00f {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "cavium,thunder", "arm,armv8";
> + reg = <0x0 0x00f>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + arm,associativity = <0 0 0x00f>;
> + };
> + cpu@100 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "cavium,thunder", "arm,armv8";
> + reg = <0x0 0x100>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + arm,associativity = <0 0 0x100>;
> + };
What is the 0x100 offset in the last-level topology field? Does this have
no significance to topology at all? I would expect that to be something
like cluster number that is relevant to caching and should be represented
as a separate level.
In contrast, the level-two topology information seems to always be
zero for all CPUs, so you could probably leave that one out.
> + soc {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
The soc node is missing a topology information, please add one.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
