----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c > index e0618bbde3613..99b5f502c9dbc 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c > @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi, bool force) > } > > /* Found a device, let's lock it so we can check if it's busy */ > - mutex_lock(&dev->dev_mutex); > + mutex_lock_nested(&dev->dev_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); The usage of mutex_lock_nested() in this patch looks fishy. Can you please elaborate a bit more why all these mutexes can be taken twice? (Any why not more often). Thanks, //richard
