On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:45:08AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at > the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for > child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are > present for any node. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml > index 895415772d1d..24422fd56e83 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml > @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ allOf: > > additionalProperties: > type: object > + additionalProperties: false > description: > Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices > are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the > -- > 2.40.1 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
