On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:18:57AM +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > > OK, it sounds like we do need a property then. Like I say I'd rather > > not have one that just works for _NO_CS in order to avoid confusion > > for > > people writing SPI device drivers, either something in the generic > > target binding or a device specific one. > Shall I invert the logic then? What I mean is I could drop property > "renesas,csi-ss" and add property "renesas,csi-no-ss" instead, therefore > without "renesas,csi-no-ss" pin SS will be used, with "renesas,csi-no-ss" > pin SS won't be used. > What do you think? That sounds fine for me, I guess we could add a further property if some new IP allows multiple options for the chip select in target mode. > Also, I could drop "renesas,csi-ss-high" and use "spi-cs-high" instead? I think that's OK but I looked less at that bit.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
