On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 08:45 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> On 25/09/2023 08:01, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Sat, 2023-09-23 at 20:09 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>
> >> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments
> until
> >> you have verified the sender or the content.
> >> On 18/09/2023 21:22, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> >>> Add mt8188 support for CMDQ secure driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 1 +
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> >> b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> >>> index 3940b9f8e774..4e047dc916b9 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> >>> @@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ static const struct gce_plat gce_plat_v8 = {
> >>> .thread_nr = 32,
> >>> .shift = 3,
> >>> .control_by_sw = true,
> >>> +.has_sec = true,
> >>
> >> No, you just added it patch ago. Do not add broken code and fix
> it.
> >> Are
> >> there some KPIs in Mediatek to have patch count?
> >>
> >
> > This patch is different from [PATCH 14/15] at the gce_plat:
> > [PATCH 13/15] is adding the flag to gce_plat_v8 for
> mediatek,mt8188-gce
> > [PATCH 14/15] is adding the flag to gce_plat_v6 for
> mediatek,mt8195-gce
> ???
>
> I talked about patch 12! Why do you add incomplete code?
Do you mean I should merge the patch 12 and 13?
I think separating the new supported mt8188 and the new supported
secure feature in different patch can make the CMDQ user know how to
make a CMDQ mailbox driver support secure feature.
Since mt8188 is a new supported IC for mailbox, so merging patch 12 and
13 into the same patch is OK.
I'll merge them at the next version. Thanks.
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
