On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 11:20 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 15/09/23 09:50, Mark Tseng ha scritto:
> > MT8188 svs gpu uses 2-line high bank and low bank to optimize the
> > voltage of opp table for higher and lower frequency respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Tseng <chun-jen.tseng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 177
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
> > index 3a2f97cd5272..fafc72df99ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
> > @@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ struct svs_platform_data {
> > * @dcbdet: svs efuse data
> > * @dcmdet: svs efuse data
> > * @turn_pt: 2-line turn point tells which opp_volt calculated by
> > high/low bank
> > + * @vbin_turn_pt: voltage bin turn point helps know which
> > svsb_volt should be overridden
> > * @type: bank type to represent it is 2-line (high/low) bank or
> > 1-line bank
> > *
> > * Svs bank will generate suitalbe voltages by below general math
> > equation
> > @@ -469,6 +470,7 @@ struct svs_bank {
> > u32 dcbdet;
> > u32 dcmdet;
> > u32 turn_pt;
> > + u32 vbin_turn_pt;
> > u32 type;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -751,11 +753,12 @@ static int svs_status_debug_show(struct
> > seq_file *m, void *v)
> >
> > ret = thermal_zone_get_temp(svsb->tzd, &tzone_temp);
> > if (ret)
> > - seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature ignore, turn_pt = %u\n",
> > - svsb->name, svsb->turn_pt);
> > + seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature ignore, vbin_turn_pt =
> > %u, turn_pt = %u\n",
> > + svsb->name, svsb->vbin_turn_pt, svsb-
> > >turn_pt);
> > else
> > - seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature = %d, turn_pt = %u\n",
> > - svsb->name, tzone_temp, svsb->turn_pt);
> > + seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature = %d, vbin_turn_pt = %u,
> > turn_pt = %u\n",
> > + svsb->name, tzone_temp, svsb->vbin_turn_pt,
> > + svsb->turn_pt);
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < svsb->opp_count; i++) {
> > opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(svsb->opp_dev,
> > @@ -952,6 +955,29 @@ static void svs_get_bank_volts_v3(struct
> > svs_platform *svsp)
> > for (i = opp_start; i < opp_stop; i++)
> > if (svsb->volt_flags & SVSB_REMOVE_DVTFIXED_VOLT)
> > svsb->volt[i] -= svsb->dvt_fixed;
> > +
> > + /* For voltage bin support */
> > + if (svsb->opp_dfreq[0] > svsb->freq_base) {
> > + svsb->volt[0] = svs_opp_volt_to_bank_volt(svsb-
> > >opp_dvolt[0],
> > + svsb-
> > >volt_step,
> > + svsb-
> > >volt_base);
> > +
> > + /* Find voltage bin turn point */
> > + for (i = 0; i < svsb->opp_count; i++) {
> > + if (svsb->opp_dfreq[i] <= svsb->freq_base) {
> > + svsb->vbin_turn_pt = i;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Override svs bank voltages */
> > + for (i = 1; i < svsb->vbin_turn_pt; i++)
> > + svsb->volt[i] = interpolate(svsb->freq_pct[0],
> > + svsb-
> > >freq_pct[svsb->vbin_turn_pt],
> > + svsb->volt[0],
> > + svsb->volt[svsb-
> > >vbin_turn_pt],
> > + svsb->freq_pct[i]);
> > + }
>
> This looks like being a new feature that applies to more than just
> MT8188?
> Goes into a different commit.
>
this is voltage bin turn point, it is for all SoC , not for mt8188.
> > }
> >
> > static void svs_set_bank_freq_pct_v3(struct svs_platform *svsp)
> > @@ -1808,6 +1834,80 @@ static bool svs_mt8192_efuse_parsing(struct
> > svs_platform *svsp)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool svs_mt8188_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
> > +{
> > + struct svs_bank *svsb;
> > + struct nvmem_cell *cell;
> > + u32 idx, i, golden_temp;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < svsp->efuse_max; i++)
> > + if (svsp->efuse[i])
> > + dev_info(svsp->dev, "M_HW_RES%d: 0x%08x\n",
> > + i, svsp->efuse[i]);
> > +
> > + if (!svsp->efuse[5]) {
> > + dev_notice(svsp->dev, "svs_efuse[5] = 0x0?\n");
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Svs efuse parsing */
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < svsp->bank_max; idx++) {
> > + svsb = &svsp->banks[idx];
> > +
> > + if (svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) {
> > + svsb->mtdes = svsp->efuse[5] & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->bdes = (svsp->efuse[5] >> 16) &
> > GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->mdes = (svsp->efuse[5] >> 24) &
> > GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->dcbdet = (svsp->efuse[15] >> 16) &
> > GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->dcmdet = (svsp->efuse[15] >> 24) &
> > GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + } else if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH) {
> > + svsb->mtdes = svsp->efuse[4] & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->bdes = (svsp->efuse[4] >> 16) &
> > GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->mdes = (svsp->efuse[4] >> 24) &
> > GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->dcbdet = svsp->efuse[14] & GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + svsb->dcmdet = (svsp->efuse[14] >> 8) &
> > GENMASK(7, 0);
> > + }
> > +
> > + svsb->vmax += svsb->dvt_fixed;
> > + }
>
> The only change between mt8192, 8195 and 8188 is this for loop; can
> we please
> commonize the rest of the function?
>
I have diff mt8192, 8195 and 8188 parsing code. It looks not only this
for loop part different, it also have vmin and ft_pgm need to check.
> > +
> > + /* Thermal efuse parsing */
> > + cell = nvmem_cell_get(svsp->dev, "t-calibration-data");
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cell)) {
> > + dev_err(svsp->dev, "no \"t-calibration-data\"? %ld\n",
> > + PTR_ERR(cell));
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + svsp->tefuse = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &svsp->tefuse_max);
> > + if (IS_ERR(svsp->tefuse)) {
> > + dev_err(svsp->dev, "cannot read thermal efuse: %ld\n",
> > + PTR_ERR(svsp->tefuse));
> > + nvmem_cell_put(cell);
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + svsp->tefuse_max /= sizeof(u32);
> > + nvmem_cell_put(cell);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < svsp->tefuse_max; i++)
> > + if (svsp->tefuse[i] != 0)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (i == svsp->tefuse_max)
> > + golden_temp = 50; /* All thermal efuse data are 0 */
> > + else
> > + golden_temp = (svsp->tefuse[0] & GENMASK(31, 24)) >>
> > 24;
> > +
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < svsp->bank_max; idx++) {
> > + svsb = &svsp->banks[idx];
> > + svsb->mts = 500;
> > + svsb->bts = (((500 * golden_temp + 250460) / 1000) -
> > 25) * 4;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool svs_mt8183_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
> > {
> > struct svs_bank *svsb;
> > @@ -2052,7 +2152,7 @@ static int svs_mt8192_platform_probe(struct
> > svs_platform *svsp)
> > return dev_err_probe(svsp->dev, PTR_ERR(svsp->rst),
> > "cannot get svs reset control\n");
> >
> > - dev = svs_add_device_link(svsp, "lvts");
> > + dev = svs_add_device_link(svsp, "thermal-sensor");
>
> This is a fix that must go in a different commit with a Fixes tag.
>
I have already checked this part, that's my mistake, I will update v2
patch to fixed this.
> > if (IS_ERR(dev))
> > return dev_err_probe(svsp->dev, PTR_ERR(dev),
> > "failed to get lvts device\n");
> > @@ -2173,6 +2273,61 @@ static struct svs_bank svs_mt8192_banks[] =
> > {
> > },
> > };
> >
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
