Hello Rob,
On 9/11/23 17:09, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 06:51:17PM +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
If st,rng-lock-conf is set, the RNG configuration in RNG_CR, RNG_HTCR
and RNG_NSCR will be locked. It is supported starting from the RNG
version present in the STM32MP13
This should be squashed into the prior binding patch.
Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
index 59abdc85a9fb..0055f14a8e3f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
@@ -37,6 +37,20 @@ required:
- reg
- clocks
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - st,stm32mp13-rng
+ then:
+ properties:
+ st,rng-lock-conf:
+ type: boolean
+ description: If set, the RNG configuration in RNG_CR, RNG_HTCR and
+ RNG_NSCR will be locked.
Define the property at the top-level and then restrict its presence in
a if/then schema.
Can you please point me to an example of such case. I can't find a way
to define at the top-level the property then restrict it to specific
compatibles.
Else I'd change
additionalProperties :false to
unevaluatedProperties: false
so the definition of the property is seen.
Best regards,
Gatien
+
additionalProperties: false
Did you test this property is allowed? No, because additionalProperties
won't work with properties defined in if/then schemas.
examples:
--
2.25.1
